I've read that it's important when creating a resume to quantify your
accomplishments. It doesn't matter if people think you are a good
salesperson. It matters that you sold 1000 widgets per year or netted
your company half a million dollars. It doesn't matter if you are a good
mentor. It matters that your "mentees" received fifteen raises over two
years. It doesn't matter that you work until all hours to get the job
done. Unless the job has results you can quantify.
I have always found this part of resume creation challenging. When I
worked as an AD, my ability to work with people and to shuffle scenes
for efficiency might have saved the production money, but was never recorded
as such. When I work as an editor, my ability to process both the needs
of the story and the cutting of the video quickly may mean I get more done in
eight hours, but ultimately my work contributes to the same half hour or
hour long show. How is it, then, that you quantify creativity and
efficiency and work ethic in a field not steeped in numbers?
I could argue that a Writer/Director/Editor resume doesn't need to be
about numbers. But ultimately, numbers are the common ground on which
people compare. No one can measure your work ethic on a piece of paper.
Efficiency is subjective, unless it has a figure attached to it. And
creativity is really about what you choose to believe.
I have spent years trying to turn a career of hard work and coordinating
people and making story choices into a set of numbers that a resume reader (human or computerized) can
understand. It's not easy, but if it needs to be "by the numbers," I'll
have to work harder at counting my accomplishments, and adding up their value.
But along with the numbers, I'll be hanging on to the creativity and the
work ethic. Because people may be counting up, but they're also counting on.
No comments:
Post a Comment