I sometimes wish I could just have the same job all the time. That I
could go to the ice cream store, or the bank, or wherever it was I
worked, knowing when I'd have to be there, and what I'd be doing. No
mystery, no excitement, no guessing game, no worry. Just something
expected, routine.
It occurred to me today that this perfect world that I just described is
what we used to call on soaps "back burner." While some characters
might be "front burner"--involved in lots of story, with their actors
needing to learn lots of lines and work lots of hours and lots of days,
others, those in "back burner" storylines, might appear much less often,
would likely have fewer lines to master, and perhaps have less required
of them. The thing is, as a soap actor, you always wanted to be front
burner, not back. Front burner was generally more interesting, and
ultimately, offered much more job security. Front burner kept you on
your toes and involved with the production team. Front burner brought
you more attention. Front burner was the goal.
So, as I see myself wish I could melt into the woodwork of a regular
job, or settle into the relative regularity of managing my children
from home, I wonder, does the constant uncertainty and change mean that I
am, in fact, front burner in a way I couldn't otherwise be? Does
jumping around, even if it feels unbelievably insecure, mean that I have
"made it" to front-burner status?
There are days when I feel as though I would happily languish on the
back burner, no new challenges, no more places to prove myself. But
keeping things "front burner" reminds me that I'm still in the game.
There may be no real security anywhere, but I am carving out my spot by
braving the front burner, by taking on the roles that are a little bit
different, a little bit trickier, a little bit scary. Will my story be
good? I don't know. All I can say is that, as with many front burner
stories, it will be an interesting one to watch.
No comments:
Post a Comment