One Life to Live's winning the editing Emmy was quite the talk at work
today. It was an exciting thing for me and my fellow editor Teresa there
to bridge the gap between what was and what is, and to talk about
getting our shiny new statues in the mail this summer.
I have often written about how the recognition of what I do tends to be
less important to me than the actual process of doing the work, and the
team with whom I work, and by and large, I do find that to be true. But
in an odd way, winning an Emmy, and talking about winning an Emmy, put a
spring in my editing step today. Don't get me wrong, it was absolutely
an honor to be nominated, but winning felt like a validation of both our
work and of the life still left in the shows.
As I was watching online updates during the Daytime Emmys last night, I
kept coming across a headline "What is an Emmy worth?" While I never got
around to reading the answer to that question, I suspect that it talked
about recognition, credibility, and possibly money. I can't say that
this new Emmy will be worth any of those to me, but even if it's not an
indicator of what WILL be, it is a reminder perhaps of what COULD be.
And "could be" is often the thing that keeps us going when things are
difficult and times are uncertain. So, I figure, if this Emmy can be my
reminder of the "could be's," I'll take it (okay, yes, I'd take it anyway). Because we all need to keep
sight of the things that COULD be in our lives. They will help us
survive the uncertainties and frustrations--and we all have those--of
all the things that just ARE.
No comments:
Post a Comment